Cheap, affordable, expensive, free: three of those four describe price, not value. The one that matters is affordable, and it can carry a big price tag.
Price is not value. ‘Cheap’ and ‘expensive’ describe absolute price; ‘affordable’ describes the ratio of value to your budget. Cheap design (a $100 logo) usually means poor quality, no brand book, maybe plagiarism. Affordable design can cost little or a lot, but its value justifies the cost and grows over time. Expensive design is only expensive if its cost exceeds the value it returns. Even free design (student work, pro bono, DIY tools) often outperforms cheap design. The rule: a design should always be affordable, meaning its value fits your budget and multiplies it.
Key takeaways
- 'Cheap' and 'expensive' are about price; 'affordable' is about value relative to budget.
- Cheap design usually brings hidden costs: no brand book, poor files, possible plagiarism.
- Affordable design can have a high absolute price and still be affordable if the value justifies it.
- Expensive = cost greater than value returned; judge design by ROI and timeframe.
- Free design (student, pro bono, DIY) is often more reliable than cheap design.
Four words, only one that matters
| Term | What it really means | Price or value? |
|---|---|---|
| Cheap | Low absolute price. Usually low quality, often just a PNG with no guidelines or brand book, and sometimes plagiarized. You get what you pay for. | Price |
| Affordable | Value that fits your budget and multiplies it. Absolute price can be low OR high; what matters is the value-to-quality ratio. | Value |
| Expensive | Cost greater than the value it provides. Closely related to ‘cheap’ (both are about price, not value). | Price |
| Free | Student work, pro bono, or DIY/preset tools. Not exceptional, but often more reliable than cheap design because cheap providers undervalue and under-skill the work. | Price (zero) |
A design is expensive if the investment cost is greater than the value it provides.
Fabio Devin
What a good logo needs (why cheap rarely delivers)
A good logo should be memorable, simple, functional, reproducible, timeless and distinctive. A cheap logo might hit those by luck, but usually you still lack print-ready materials, design guidelines and a brand book, so it can’t stay coherent. The classic ‘fast, good, cheap: pick two’ triangle applies, and with cheap design even two often don’t hold.
Value in practice: Zara, Amazon, and a free Google logo
Judge design by ROI over time. Zara reportedly paid about $1.2M for a controversial Julien Baron rebrand; against its daily revenue that’s recouped in well under an hour, the logo went viral (billions in earned media, a growth-hacking effect), and sales rose sharply that month, high price, but clearly affordable. Amazon’s platform investment is enormous yet recouped in a fraction of a day at its scale. Conversely, in 1998 Larry Page made Google’s first (ugly) logo for free in GIMP, and it did its job. It’s easier to find a free design that works than a cheap one that does.
A rule of thumb for e-commerce ROI
For a standard online project, if the design/build recovers its cost in 90-180 days it’s a good, affordable deal; under 90 days signals a highly professional agency; over 180 days, the price is likely expensive relative to the return. (Mega-sites and B2B follow different criteria.) The takeaway: a $10,000 site that returns quickly is affordable, while a $1,000 site that never converts is not cheap, it’s expensive.
‘Cheap’ means low absolute price, usually low quality. ‘Affordable’ means the value justifies the cost relative to your budget, whether the price is low or high.
In absolute terms, yes. A high price tag can still be affordable if the design’s value clearly exceeds it and multiplies your budget, as with Zara’s rebrand.
Not necessarily. Expensive and cheap both describe price. A high price only makes sense when the value returned is equally high.
Often more than cheap design. Student work, pro bono and DIY tools can do the job, whereas cheap providers frequently undervalue and under-skill the work.
By ROI and timeframe. For standard online projects, recovering the cost in 90-180 days is a good, affordable deal; much longer suggests the price was too high.
Want affordable design, real value for your budget? Talk to Dorve.
Start a project