UX without research is rolling dice and hoping. Here is the actual scientific method, in seven beginner-friendly steps that still hold up academically.
Scientific research is a series of phases for answering a problem through empirical observation and logical reasoning. There is no single scientific method, but most research shares the same steps: (1) delimit the scope and state the problem, (2) review the literature, (3) state hypotheses, (4) test hypotheses with standardized, operationalized procedures, (5) analyze the results, (6) draw conclusions and discuss theory, (7) communicate/publish the results so they can be scrutinized and replicated. In UX, the deliverable itself is the ‘publication’. The steps can flex, but you don’t skip any.
Key takeaways
- All scientific research starts from a problem, rests on empirical observation, and reasons toward new knowledge.
- There is no single scientific method; steps flex by discipline and context, but none should be skipped.
- A tight scope (sample, geography, demographics) keeps data relevant, as in an A/B test for over-50 life insurance in New York.
- A hypothesis is a tentative answer that must always be tested, never assumed true.
- In UX, the deliverable is the publication; every step must be documented for the client.
- UX research basics can be learned in about a week, but analysis should be supervised by expert researchers.
The 7 steps
Conducting UX without research is like rolling the dice and hoping for the best. It might work, but the odds of success are almost nil.
Mariana Arismendi, PhD
Is UX research hard?
General scientific research takes real study, but applying research methods in UX is relatively simple and strictly necessary. You can grasp the basics in about a week; becoming a strong researcher takes years. Beginners can handle simpler methods, but data analysis and research direction should be supervised by expert researchers. For a deeper method, see the factorial design and A/B & multivariate testing guides.
Delimit scope and state the problem, review the literature, state hypotheses, test them with standardized procedures, analyze results, draw conclusions, and communicate the results.
No. Methods differ by discipline and historical context, but they share a common structure and none of the core steps should be skipped.
A tentative, testable answer to a research question. It holds no inherent truth and must always be tested against observable consequences.
To specify the empirical indicators and measurements needed to gather data that can support or falsify the hypothesis.
The basics take about a week, and simpler methods can be run by beginners, but analysis and direction should be supervised by experts, and mastery takes years.
Want research-backed UX instead of guesswork? Talk to Dorve.
Start a project